01. Field view
02. Installation of equipment
03. Bulk filling
04. Specific gravity test and flow value test
05. Inlet water connection and product injection
06. Check filler overflow
Classification | sinkhole protection grouting | cement metal filling | sand filling | urethane foam filling |
---|---|---|---|---|
Outline of the
construction method |
ㆍIt is an effective technique for preven -ting full filling and ground deformation of the poured adobe by injecting low- pressure into the foamed cement slurry of high-magneticity. | ㆍA method of filling old pipes with pump cars, using cement mallet (1:1~1:3) | ㆍA method of filling old pipes with pneumatic injection, using sand | ㆍA technique to fill an old tube using urethane drug with two- component foam infusion material |
infusion material | ㆍCement+water + aerosol + (mixture) ㆍspecific gravity : 0.5 ~0.6 |
ㆍCement+Sand+Water ㆍweight : 2.3 |
ㆍCement+Sand+Water ㆍweight : 2.3 |
ㆍUrethane solution:TBU(A)+CBU(B) ㆍspecific gravity: not more than 0.1 |
Advantage | ㆍThe process is simple and construction
is fast. ㆍExcavation is not necessary (or minim -ized) No risk of breakage and disposal costs. ㆍIt has the best fluidity and long-distance injection (About 800M) is possible, Can be minimized for branch offices. ㆍLight weight (0.5 ~ 0.6) low pressure injection (2 ~ 5kg / ㎠) affect the ground around the pipe Not allowed. ㆍExcellent insulation and vibration absor -ption effect. |
ㆍSimple process and fast construction. ㆍHighest strength. |
ㆍExcellent insulation and vibration absorption effect. | ㆍExcellent insulation and vibration
absorption effect. ㆍLightest weight |
Weight | 45kg/㎡ | 100kg/㎡ | 66kg/㎡ | 120kg/㎡ |
Weakness | ㆍThe existing closed pipe Removal costs are incurred when installing underground facilities. | ㆍIt has more fluidity than light
-weight bubble Con'c One injection
distance is short.(Within 100M) → injection station / installation point of injection tube The con -struction cost is increased. ㆍAs the injection distance (injection amount) increases Separation phenomenon of material (sand) As a result, It is difficult to secure full filling. |
ㆍFrom pneumatic injection At
distances of up to 10 meters
There are restrictions on injection. → short injection distance, homogeneous filling Difficult → Increase of installation point of injection base ㆍThe injection amount of 20m3 / 8hr or less, Air increases unrealistically. → Apply to large doses difficulty. |
ㆍFoaming and hardening speed
is fast Very short injectable distance (Within 30M). → The injection distance is short, Increase in installation area ㆍMaterial cost is the most expensive. → except for urgent small sections Practically difficult to apply. ㆍIt is weak in water and moisture. Due to its high fluidity, Not suitable. |
Applicability | ㆍTraffic is crowded, Excellent applicability
to urban areas. ㆍSection where drilling equipment is difficult to access. ㆍConcerned about subsidence due to closed Areas requiring urgent action. |
ㆍTraffic is congested, Applicable
to many urban areas. ㆍSection where drilling equipment is difficult to access. ㆍConcerned about subsidence due to closed Areas requiring urgent action. |
ㆍTraffic is congested, Applicable
to many urban areas. ㆍSection where drilling equipment is difficult to access. ㆍConcerned about subsidence due to closed Areas requiring urgent action. |
ㆍTraffic is congested, Applicable
to many urban areas. ㆍSection where drilling equipment is difficult to access. ㆍConcerned about subsidence due to closed Areas requiring urgent action. |
Economics | ㆍSchematic construction cost : about
220,000 won/m (design, direct construction cost) ※The incidental cost savings, such as shortening of air, handling of ground materials, and processing of civil complaints, are also very large |
ㆍSchematic construction cost: approx. 150,000 won/m (design, direct construction cost) | ㆍSchematic construction cost : approximately 340,000 won/m (design, direct construction cost) | ㆍSchematic construction cost : approximately 2 million won/m (design, direct construction cost) |